Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Indeed, but the tcp struct field cinfo.dst_port is only set in such cases, otherwise, for normal tcp, is 0.
I let this PR in background for a while to think if other option would be better, but ultimately adding more conditions would add complexity without benefits, because for normal TCP connections cinfo.dst_port is 0 and the (l_port == 0) was already there and it will match before comparing (l_port == a->parent->cinfo.dst_port).
&& ((l_port == 0) || (l_port == a->parent->rcv.dst_port)
|| (l_port == a->parent->cinfo.dst_port))
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.