Just to add another comment here:
Using a "real" cryptographic hash function is of course better from mathematical Point of view. But it might be good enough to just use the CRC32 function, that e.g. also carrierroute uses. If I remember the 1&1 internal test suite good enough, this is for a larger number of request quite ok (+/- 1% accuracy). Have a look to the carrierroute module and to core/hash_func.[c,h]. This could save you a bit of work and would be usable without the openssl dependency.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.