I strictly disagree with the purpose of the ignoring.
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 01:51:14 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> The ignoring was made on purpose, allowing to handle the registrations even
> the socket is different. Think about the case when kamailio is running on a
> server changing the IP (eg, on a DSL link), being restarted when the
> provider changes the address.
>
> In current form, the patch will not be accepted - solutions:
>
> * save server_id in usrloc and rely on that for loading only own records
> (it requires adding a new column to location database) * make a parameter
> to enable/disable this behavior
>
> The parameter should be done even with server_id, because I think that two
> servers are configured to use the same database table when they want to
> share the location. If you don't want the two (or more) servers to share
> the location, then you can create many location tables with different name
> but same structure (and add a record to version table) and each server is
> using a different one.
>
> As for the pull request, you have to re-sync your repository with the main
> one, because in pull requests you push now also the patches for geoip2
> module, which is already part of the kamailio.
>
> I am going to close this item here.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/66#issuecomment-72827091
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.