Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Hi,
I think there is an issue with writing CDRs on failover scenarios.
I have two servers with Kamailio. Both server running Debian 11 (bulleye) and latest Kamailio 5.6.1 from git.
I'm using DMQ to sync dialogs and htable between these servers, so both servers have the same knowledge of dialog state. Both Kamailio uses nobind option, so I can switch a VIP from one server to the other one. This is managed with keepalived. Switching the VIP from one server the other one works fine an while a call is running I can switch the VIP. I can see that the BYE Message is handled OK after I made a switch. I can see that acc is triggered but what is missing is acc_cdr in this case.
I'm using htable to fill all necessary variables to complete the CDR an I can see that all values are synced correctly.
The acc_cdr is created fine if there is no failover so i think it can't be an configuration issue.
Both server holds the same Kamailio configuration except the IP.
version: kamailio 5.6.1 (x86_64/linux) bfc5c2-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: bfc5c2 -dirty compiled with gcc 10.2.1
root@voip-lab-proxy01:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Release: 11 Codename: bullseye
root@voip-lab-proxy01:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian Address sizes: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual CPU(s): 4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model: 23 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz Stepping: 10 CPU MHz: 2500.088 BogoMIPS: 5000.17 Virtualization: VT-x Hypervisor vendor: KVM Virtualization type: full L1d cache: 128 KiB L1i cache: 128 KiB L2 cache: 16 MiB L3 cache: 16 MiB NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3 Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected Vulnerability L1tf: Mitigation; PTE Inversion; VMX EPT disabled Vulnerability Mds: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode; SMT Host state unknown Vulnerability Meltdown: Mitigation; PTI Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Unknown: No mitigations Vulnerability Retbleed: Not affected Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines, STIBP disabled, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx pdpe1gb lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl xtopology cpuid tsc_known_freq pni vmx ssse3 cx16 pdcm sse4_1 x2apic tsc_deadline_timer xsave hypervisor lahf_lm cpuid_fault pti tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority vpid tsc_adjust arat arch_capabilit ies
If you need more information, please let me know. As I'm running this on a test system I can reproduce the issue at any time.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.