On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:miconda@gmail.com">miconda@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 07/08/2009 09:17 AM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Thanks for the suggestion Jiri. So far I have been monitoring sr and I know that the TCP async implementation might resolve some problems we're facing with kamailio.<br>
<br>
But I'm a bit conservative and I want to do several verifications of sr before doing the "switch". So for now we stick to kamailio.<br>
<br>
Does this TCP supervisor process priority sounds familiar to you for tuning kamailio ?<br>
</blockquote></div>
this is good in any case, if you have high tcp load, as the dispatching of the connections is done with priority. Then are a bunch of worker processes dealing with tcp traffic.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Could you point me to the right documentation in order to achieve this ?<br><br>Thanks in advance<br>-pascal<br><br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Regards,<br>
Pascal<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Jiri Kuthan <<a href="mailto:jiri@iptel.org" target="_blank">jiri@iptel.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jiri@iptel.org" target="_blank">jiri@iptel.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
if you are concerned about TCP performance (Which may be a justified<br>
concern -- from any possible viewpoint TCP is not easy for SIP),<br>
I suggest you consider the sip-router core. There has been (and I<br>
think<br>
still will be) tremendous effort put in it.<br>
<br>
-jiri<br>
<br>
Pascal Maugeri wrote:<br>
<br>
Hi<br>
<br>
I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in<br>
handling<br>
TCP connections:<br>
<br>
"First, the TCP supervisor process must be given an elevated<br>
priority<br>
level in order to prevent anomalous behavior due to the Linux<br>
scheduler."<br>
<br>
First of all, as this is quite old paper (it refers to OpenSER<br>
1.2),<br>
I'm wondering if such a tuning is still needed for Kamailio<br>
1.5 branch<br>
? If yes, how can I do this ?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Pascal<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list<br></div>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.kamailio.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.kamailio.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Users@lists.kamailio.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.kamailio.org</a>><div class="im"><br>
<a href="http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
<br></div>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<div class="im"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@lists.kamailio.org" target="_blank">Users@lists.kamailio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
-- <br><div><div></div><div class="h5">
Daniel-Constantin Mierla<br>
<a href="http://www.asipto.com/" target="_blank">http://www.asipto.com/</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>