<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Juha Heinanen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jh@tutpro.com">jh@tutpro.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Asim Riaz writes:<br>
<br>
> thats what i got from output, which seems ok .<br>
> GW:: GRP_ID=1 URI=sip:X.X.X.X:5060;transport=udp STRIP=0 TAG= FLAGS=0<br>
> RULE:: PREFIX=0 FROM_URI=NULL GRP_ID=1 PRIORITY=1<br>
<br>
</div>i don't have version 1.4 of lcr module in my laptop, but in order to<br>
find out if there is a bug, for example, in hash table lookup code, you<br>
should show the whole output lcr_dump, i.e., show all routes and<br>
gateways.<br>
<br>
or are you saying that if the two entries is the full output of lcr_dump,<br>
calling load_gws() on an r-uri where userpart is numeric and starts with<br>
09, does not find any gws?</blockquote><div>yes two entries are the full output of lcr_dump, userpart of ruri is starting from 0 but it does not find gateway. tried to increased the debug level but not getting anything related to lcr.<br>
<br><br><br>Thanks,<br>Asim<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- juha<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>