Hi everyone again,<br><br> To make a point on this subject, and try to resume all that was said:<br><br> 1º If i need a real VoIP system were billing is made by second (as it is in all the mobile providers) i need to have full control of the media - then it's necessary to implement mediaproxy (or other media relay) to accomplish accurate billing and get all the call information;<br>
<br> 2º If the system doesn't need to have the accurate billing system, and doesn't matter if the call duration is 1 minute or 1,5 minute - for example a service that is paid monthly independently of the calls made by the user - i don't need to use mediaproxy in all calls, only in the NATed ones;<br>
<br> I think that's what i can resume of all that was said.<br> My problem now is to dimensioning this system to accomplish something like having 100 calls simultaneously (lets say all with mediaproxy - the "worst" case).<br>
Mark Sayer said that is system is based on Asterisk and he can accomplish 200 calls simultaneously.<br> Can anyone give more ideas in this matter?<br><br> Thanks and regards<br><br> Nuno<br> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2008/10/30 Henning Westerholt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de">henning.westerholt@1und1.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Thursday 30 October 2008, Nuno Marques wrote:<br>
> Ok... Maybe you're right. I've read somewhere that this service is needed<br>
> for taping reasons (policy and other law enforcements). If it's needed whe<br>
> can just turn it on for that specific number, right?<br>
<br>
</div>Hi Nuno,<br>
<br>
at least in some countries you must prevent the caller from noticing the<br>
surveilance. So if you transfer only some media of certain users this may<br>
lead to problems in this regards.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Henning<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>