<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.12.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:43 +0200, Jiri Kuthan wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000">I'm hearing that the interest in porting those is rather low, I just expressed</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000">my opinion that it would do good to openser if someone took the time to do it.</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#000000">The overhauls have greatly improved robustness of SER after openser forked off.</FONT></TT><FONT COLOR="#000000"> </FONT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
But can't we assume than bogdan's work on 1.2 might give OpenSER the same level of robustness as <BR>
SER's TM/timers overhaul, and give this code time to stabilize before thinking of porting ? <BR>
<BR>
I mean, what would let you think that 1.2 TM/timers is less robust than SER's 2.0 modifications ?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>