Hi Daniel.<br>
<br>
Thanks for your answer.<br>
<br>
My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my UAS, as described is another instance of Openser.<br>
<br>
I will try what you sugest.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Sergio Gutiérrez.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Daniel-Constantin Mierla</b> <<a href="mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro">daniel@voice-system.ro</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello,<br><br>do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS is another<br>openser with just sending a 200 ok reply or sipp with uas scenario?<br><br>First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very simple config
<br>with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start sipp. See<br>what results you get and that should be the reference for sipp capacity.<br>Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different servers, see
<br>if you get the cumulative value better.<br><br>The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel execution of<br>openser processes has some impact as well.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Daniel<br><br><br>On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
<br>> Hi.<br>><br>> Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire T2000 running<br>> Solaris 10.<br>> Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC Systems, and<br>> used the recommended settings to generate accurate code for my
<br>> Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance tests are<br>> just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.<br>><br>> My setup is the following:<br>><br>> Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC T1
1.2 GHZ 6 Core.<br>> UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4 UlraSPARC III+ 900 Mhz<br>> Software versions listed as on the webpage.<br>><br>> openser -V output:<br>> version: openser 1.2.0-notls
(sparc/solaris)<br>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,<br>> SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP<br>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
<br>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535<br>> poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.<br>> svnrevision: unknown<br>> @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $<br>> main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc
4.0.3<br>><br>><br>> I would thank any idea about how could I improve the performnace of my<br>> setup. I think that because of the hardware specifications, the result<br>> should be at least equal than listed.
<br>><br>> Thanks in advance.<br>><br>> Kind regards.<br>><br>> Sergio Gutiérrez.<br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> Users mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Users@openser.org">Users@openser.org</a><br>> <a href="http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users">http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>>
<br></blockquote></div><br>