<div>Thanks for the quick response. Makes sense I guess.</div>
<div><br>Now need a plan to upgrade all servers.. :)</div>
<div><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 06/02/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu</b> <<a href="mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro">bogdan@voice-system.ro</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi Max,<br><br>the policy of the project is to maintain (fix) only the latest stable<br>version. We want to encourage people to use the latest version only -
<br>otherwise, the overhead for apply fixes to all previous releases will be<br>to much.<br><br>my advice is to upgrade to 1.1.1 - this will guarantee you are running<br>the best version.<br><br>regards,<br>bogdan<br><br>
Max Gregorian wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>><br>> with regards to the release of v.1.1.1 I have a few questions.<br>><br>> Firstly, what is to become of v1.0.1? Are you recommending all users<br>> with 1.0.1 also upgrade directly to
v.1.1.1?<br>><br>> Secondly, does 1.0.1 suffer from most (if not all) the same bugs as<br>> 1.1.0? I am particularly interested in any documented issues with<br>> handling response ACKs for 4xx class errors as I am currently
<br>> experiencing a few issues with these, and I noticed in the changelog<br>> for 1.1.1 that a bug with ACK matching for non-200 class responses has<br>> recently been fixed.<br>><br>> I ask this I noticed you are gradually phasing out all documentation
<br>> to do with 1.0.1 on the openser website. As such, is 1.0.1 to be<br>> deprecated?<br>><br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> Users mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Users@openser.org">Users@openser.org</a><br>> <a href="http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users">http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>>
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>