<div dir="ltr">Hi Daniel,<br><br><br>I've stumbled on that one as well. It confused me a little bit, when I read "Confirmed working", as I wasn't seeing that from my own tests. TCP cannot connect, which I would expect as rtpengine mainly deals with UDP streams, but when listening on incoming and outgoing UDP on the announced BFCP port, I wasn't seeing anything outgoing. This led me to believe that the packets were just dropped and that BFCP wasn't being proxied.<br><br>Obviously I could have made an error in my tests, but this was at least my initial conclusion. I will check again, just to be absolutely sure.<br><div><br></div><div><br>/René<br><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 14:23, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <<a href="mailto:miconda@gmail.com">miconda@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>a quick search on rtpengine and BFCP returned a rather old issue
opened on rtpengine project quite long time ago:</p>
<p> * <a href="https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/80" target="_blank">https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/80</a></p>
<p>Not sure if the resolution was that it works relaying through
rtpengine or just do not touch the SDP attributes related to it.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I would just go ahead and test with rtpengine and see if
works.<br>
</p>
<p>Cheers,<br>
Daniel<br>
</p>
<div>On 15.09.20 10:54, René Hansen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm rather new to Kamailio and RTPEngine, so I'm looking for
some help in locating any insights, documentation, guides or
examples that resemble my use case.<br>
<br>
Currently I've got both running in working order and I can do
SIP calls with both video and audio. Now I'm trying to figure
out how to pass through BFCP as well. From what I understand so
far, since BFCP isn't strictly RTP, it's not something that's
outright supported. Please correct me if my assumption is wrong.<br>
<br>
My observation is that "<b>m=application PORT
{UDP,TCP}/BFCP *</b>"<i> </i>SDP<i> </i>lines doesn't seem to
open for traffic as other media lines do. (Obviously expected if
it's not supported)<br>
<br>
So I'm really just looking for any suggestions for, or where to
start looking, in getting BFCP support.<br>
<br>
I do have the option of BFCP over both TCP and UDP, so if I
could somehow include the originator IP as an added attribute in
the re-written SDP answer, I could then just connect directly,
around the proxy. I've yet to figure out how to do that as well
however.<br>
<br>
Any pointers are much appreciated.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
René Hansen</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org" target="_blank">sr-users@lists.kamailio.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users" target="_blank">https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre cols="72">--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- <a href="http://www.asipto.com" target="_blank">www.asipto.com</a>
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/miconda" target="_blank">www.twitter.com/miconda</a> -- <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com/in/miconda</a>
Funding: <a href="https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla" target="_blank">https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla</a></pre>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">/René</div></div>