<p>Thanks for the reply Daniel. You are right about the redundancy/high-availability remarks.</p>
<p>But still I can see scenarios where the current behaviour can cause problems. Imagine a small dialog timeout combined with SIP Session Timer keep-alive re-INVITEs. The proxy 1 would not expire the dialog, but proxy2 (which did not got the re-INVITE) would expire it. Of course one could use DMQ or synchronize the dialog data by another means.</p>
<p>What do you think about something like this skip_remote_socket option which exists in usrloc as well:<br>
<a href="https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/usrloc.html#usrloc.p.skip_remote_socket" rel="nofollow">https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/usrloc.html#usrloc.p.skip_remote_socket</a></p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2080?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABO7UZNR44XUAUYUAMPFTKDQMHELTA5CNFSM4I3IQ34KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD75DJ5Y#issuecomment-536491255">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABO7UZJXNBWBUKPSWAT2SPDQMHELTANCNFSM4I3IQ34A">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABO7UZIA5G3UEGJQMBTXB5TQMHELTA5CNFSM4I3IQ34KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD75DJ5Y.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2080?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=ABO7UZNR44XUAUYUAMPFTKDQMHELTA5CNFSM4I3IQ34KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD75DJ5Y#issuecomment-536491255",
"url": "https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2080?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=ABO7UZNR44XUAUYUAMPFTKDQMHELTA5CNFSM4I3IQ34KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD75DJ5Y#issuecomment-536491255",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>